Earth First! 25, no. 6
Keywords:
activism, journalism, conservation, deforestation, environmentalism, nonviolent resistance, political ecology, protests, wildernessAbstract
Josh, Lenny, Oskar, and Turtle, eds., Earth First! 25, no. 6 (1 September 2005). Republished by the Environment & Society Portal, Multimedia Library. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/7212.
INNARDS- A FORCE OF NATURE: ONE SOUTHWEST RIVER COMES BACK TO LIFE
- WILD DESERT RIVER RUNS DRY
- HAIDA GWAII (R)EVOLUTION: A FIRST NATIONS VICTORY
- RESPONDING TO “THE BULLSHIT THAT MUST END”
- MOUNTAIN JUSTICE SUMMER DISRUPTS COAL INDUSTRY
- ROADLESS SUMMER STARTS OUT ON A LONG ROAD
- THIS RAT IS VERMIN: OPPOSING THE NEW RECREATION ACCESS TAX
- MAINE EF! DAMS SCUM CREEK
- THE TIMBER INDUSTRY’S NEW SPIN
- SUTIKALH OCCUPATION: ST’AT’IMC NATION DEFIES SKI RESORT
- GRASSROOTS ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS TAKE ON SEXUAL ASSAULT
- REMEMBERING MATTHEW DAVID HAUN
- A WARRIOR WHOSE LOVE SHINED OUTWARD: BEN WHITE
- LEGENDARY ACTIVlST JOAN NORMAN PASSES ON
- LOSING A GREAT ONE: KEE WATCHMAN
- POLLUTION, APARTHEID AND PROTEST IN OCCUPIED PALESTINE
- GRAND JURY OR GRAND INQUISITION?
- FIGHTING A LOSING BATTLE
- RAISE A RUCKUS FOR ROB LOS RICOS!
- ALIVE AND WILD AS EVER AT THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY RRR
- KATÚAH RRR ORGANIZERS WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
- CHINESE FARMERS SHUT DOWN DRUG FACTORY
At times, we might be tempted to censor voices that we view as reactionary, divisive or excessively critical but what purpose would that really serve? Censorship would minimize our awareness of questionable trends within the movement, and our ability to respond effectively. Providing an editorial disclaimer specifically for content that we find objectionable—as some readers have suggested—would alienate the author and marginalize like-minded EF!ers. It would also grant the editorial collective a level of authority that is incompatible with an egalitarian movement.
— EF! Journal Collective
The Rachel Carson Center’s Environment & Society Portal makes archival materials openly accessible for purposes of research and education. Views expressed in these materials do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the Rachel Carson Center or its partners.
